free questionnaire

Case study 1 - Life Sciences

 

“I worked with Elisabeth in a couple different capacities [including]… a large programme improving …project team collaboration. Elisabeth has exceptional interpersonal and communication skills. Her follow-through to deliver results is exemplary. She has a very good understanding of team collaboration techniques, information and programme management. ...”

Director, Programme Management.


Subscribe to our Newsletter

Please visit our newsletter site to read more from RiverRhee Consulting and to sign up to receive our periodic news.

Working collaboratively

 

Case study 2 - Other businesses 

Need: An international event management company wanted to gain better use of Sharepoint to enhance the sharing of information between teams, departments and business units, to pool resources and learn from ech other, in conjunction with a proposed upgrade to Sharepoint 2010.

Solution: Structured discussions with representatives from the different business divisions were held in order to identify key gaps regarding the sharing of, and access to, personal and organisational knowledge.

A set of User Requirements against the “out of the box” product were drawn up, which if implemented, would provide a technology enabler.

A particular gap of gaining help from experts within the company was identified, and a process was drawn up for development and implemention as an enhancement of SP2010.

Outcome: The User Requirements were accepted as an input to the potential implementation of Sharepoint 2010.

Case study 1 - Life Sciences 

Need: Pharmaceutical Company needed Team Collaboration tools and underlying working practices defined and implemented throughout the R&D organization to enhance project team effectiveness.

Solution: Drew on extensive experience of coaching teams in the use of collaborative working tools, and of managing projects and change.

Led the joint business / IT team and worked with project team representatives through focus groups to define the collaborative working practices, agree the components and structure of the tools to be used, roll these out, and evaluate the outcomes.

Outcome: 200-300 project teams adopted this way of working during the course of the project and it continued to be deployed as a standard approach beyond the life of the project.